What is another word for calumniators?

Pronunciation: [kˈaləmnˌɪe͡ɪtəz] (IPA)

Calumniators are those who make false and malicious statements about someone with the intent to damage their reputation. There are many synonyms to describe these types of individuals, including slanderers, defamers, smear campaigners, character assassins, and mudslingers. Other words that describe those who spread false information include vituperators, backbiters, detractors, and libelers. These individuals often operate through gossip, spreading rumors, and disseminating hurtful lies to damage their target's reputation. Regardless of the term used, it is important to recognize and call out these types of individuals to prevent them from causing harm to others.

What are the hypernyms for Calumniators?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for calumniators?

The word "calumniators" refers to people who make false or slanderous statements about someone else with malicious intent. Antonyms for "calumniators" might include individuals who speak truthfully and with kindness, such as supporters, defenders, or advocates. These are people who stand up for others and who want to see them succeed. Other antonyms could include those who act in good faith and with sincerity, such as allies, colleagues, or acquaintances. These are individuals who are trustworthy and reliable, and who have earned the respect and admiration of those around them. In short, antonyms for "calumniators" embody everything that is admirable and commendable about human behavior.

What are the antonyms for Calumniators?

Famous quotes with Calumniators

  • I believe that the confidence of Hungary in me is not shaken by misfortune nor broken by my calumniators.
    Lajos Kossuth
  • According to … the French counterrevolutionaries and German Romantics, … the corpus of prejudices was a country’s cultural treasure, its ancient and tested intelligence, present as the consciousness and guardian of its thought. Prejudices were the “we” of every “I”, the past in the present, the revered vessels of the nation’s memory, its judgements carried from age to age. Pretending to spread enlightenment, the philosophes had set out to extirpate these precious residua. … The result was that they had uprooted men from their culture at the very moment when they bragged of how they would cultivate them. … Convinced that they were emancipating souls, they succeeded only in deracinating them. These calumniators of the commonplace had not freed understanding from its chains, but cut it off from its sources. The individual who, thanks to them, must now cast off childish things, had really abandoned his own nature. … The promises of the cogito were illusory: free from prejudice, cut off from the influence of national idiom, the subject was not free but shrivelled and devitalised. … Everyday opinion should therefore be regarded as the soil where thought was nourished, its hearth and sanctuary, … and not, as the philosophes would have it, as some alien authority which overwhelmed and crushed it. … The cogito needed to be steeped in the profundities of the collective mind; the broken links with the past needed repairing; the quest for independence should yield to that for authenticity. Men should abandon their scepticism and give themselves over to the comforting warmth of majoritarian ideas, bowing down before their infallible authority.
    Alain Finkielkraut

Word of the Day

inconstructible
The word "inconstructible" suggests that something is impossible to construct or build. Its antonyms, therefore, would be words that imply the opposite. For example, "constructible...