What are the opposite words for dependents?

The antonyms for the word "dependents" are independent, self-sufficient, autonomous, self-reliant, and self-supporting. These words imply that a person is capable of existing and operating without the help or support of others. To be independent means to take care of oneself and not rely on others for support. Self-sufficient denotes a person who can provide for their needs without external assistance. Autonomous implies being self-governed or acting independently. Self-reliant suggests that a person is self-assured and confident in their abilities to take care of themselves. Self-supporting refers to someone who can adequately provide for themselves financially. These antonyms demonstrate the opposite of dependency and showcase the ability of an individual to thrive without external assistance.

What are the antonyms for Dependents?

• n.

  • client
  • manager
  ,
  • marketer
  ,
  • owner
  ,
  • rear
  .
  • clientele
  • management
  ,
  • ownership
  .
  • following
  • disbelievers
  ,
  • opposition
  .
  • minion
  • leader
  ,
  • master
  .
  • parasite
  • blessing
  .
  • pauper
  • rich
  ,
  • wealthy
  .
  • son
  • daughter
  .
  • subordinate
  • boss
  ,
  • chief
  ,
  • major
  ,
  • superior
  .
  • ward
  • adult
  .

Usage examples for Dependents

Famous quotes with Dependents

• If you treat with courtesy your equal, who is privileged to resent an impertinence, how much more cautious should you be to your dependents, from whom you demand a respectful demeanor.

  Robert Chambers
• Whatever knowledge of the question is manifested herein comes largely from my work in a variety of movements intended either to diminish the number of dependents or to ameliorate the conditions of poverty.

  Robert Hunter (author)
• Pro-slavery impulse still governs the Democratic Party, the party of government sinecures. It is the party that wants to use political power to tax us not for any common good, but to eat while we work. Consider the Great Society and its legacy. In the fall of 1964, I was on the speech-writing staff of the Goldwater campaign. In September and October I went on a number of forays to college campuses, where I debated spokesmen for our opponents. My argument always started from here. In 1964 the economy, thanks to the Kennedy tax cuts, was growing at the remarkable annual rate of four percent. But federal revenues were growing at 20 percent; five times as fast. The real issue in the election, I said, was what was to happen to that cornucopia of revenue. Barry Goldwater would use it to reduce the deficit and to further reduce taxes; Lyndon Johnson would use it to start vast new federal programs. At that point I could not say what programs, but I knew that the real purpose of them would be to create a new class of dependents upon the Democratic Party. The ink was hardly dry on the election returns before Johnson invented the war on poverty; and proved my prediction correct. One did not need to be cynical to see that the poor were not a reason for the expansion of bureaucracy; the expansion of bureaucracy was a reason for the poor. Every failure to reduce poverty was always represented as another reason to increase expenditures on the poor. The ultimate beneficiary was the Democratic Party. Every federal bureaucrat became in effect a precinct captain, delivering the votes of his constituents. His job was to enlarge the pool of constituents. But every increase in that pool meant a diminution of our property and our freedom.

  Harry V. Jaffa
• ...the existence of a 'system' that was ruining the country. The system of upstarts; of low-bred, low-minded sycophants usurping the stations designed by nature, by reason, by the Constitution, and by the interests of the people, to men of high birth, eminent talents, or great national services; the system by which the ancient Aristocracy and the Church have been undermined; by which the ancient gentry of the kingdom have been almost extinguished, their means of support having been transferred, by the hand of the tax gatherer, to contractors, jobbers and Jews; the system by which but too many of the higher orders have been rendered the servile dependents of the minister of the day, and by which the lower, their generous spirit first broken down, have been moulded into a mass of parish fed paupers. Unless it be the intention, the solemn resolution, to change this , let no one talk to me of a ; for, until this system be destroyed...until the filthy tribe of jobbers, brokers and peculators shall be swept from the councils of the nation and the society of her statesmen...there is no change of , that can, for a single hour, retard the mighty mischief that we dread.

  William Cobbett

Related words & questions

Related words: dependant, dependent spouse, withdrawing dependents, how to withdraw dependents, how to withdraw dependents from ira, how to withdraw dependents from 401k

Related questions:

What is a dependent's tax status?

How do you withdraw dependents from ira?

How to withdraw dependents from 401k?

What is the difference between?

non-evolutionary

The antonyms for the word "non-evolutionary" are "evolutionary," "progressive," and "adaptive." These words indicate a trend towards change, growth, and development - quite the opp...