What is another word for passes in?

Pronunciation: [pˈasɪz ˈɪn] (IPA)

There are a plethora of synonyms that can be used instead of "passes in," which refers to the act of dying or passing away. Some common options include "goes," "expires," "departs," "crosses over," "moves on," and "passes on." Other variations might include "leaves this life," "meets their maker," "shuffles off this mortal coil," or "enters the great beyond." Ultimately, the choice of synonym may depend on the tone or context of the situation. While some phrases may be more poetic or euphemistic, others may be more straightforward or blunt in their delivery.

What are the hypernyms for Passes in?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for passes in?

Antonyms for "passes in" would include "stays out", "remains outside", or "keeps away". These words imply a deliberate effort to avoid entering a particular place or situation. Other antonyms could include "leaves", "exits", or "departs". These words suggest a physical movement away from a location or a state of being. Additionally, antonyms for "passes in" could be "overlooks" or "ignores", indicating a lack of attention or interest in something. In any case, antonyms for "passes in" imply a degree of separation or distance, whether literal or figurative.

What are the antonyms for Passes in?

Famous quotes with Passes in

  • There are two ways of passing from this world - one in light and one in darkness. When one passes in light, he does not come back but when one passes in darkness, he returns.
    Bhagavad Gita
  • [I]f you want to about faith, and offer a reasoned (and reason-responsive) defense of faith as an extra category of belief worthy of special consideration, I'm eager to [participate]. I certainly grant the existence of the phenomenon of faith; what I want to see is a reasoned ground for taking faith as a , and not, say, just as a way people comfort themselves and each other (a worthy function that I do take seriously). But you must not expect me to go along with your defense of faith as a path to truth if at any point you appeal to the very dispensation you are supposedly trying to justify. Before you appeal to faith when reason has you backed into a corner, think about whether you really want to abandon reason when reason is on your side. You are sightseeing with a loved one in a foreign land, and your loved one is brutally murdered in front of your eyes. At the trial it turns out that in this land friends of the accused may be called as witnesses for the defense, testifying about their faith in his innocence. You watch the parade of his moist-eyed friends, obviously sincere, proudly proclaiming their undying faith in the innocence of the man you saw commit the terrible deed. The judge listens intently and respectfully, obviously more moved by this outpouring than by all the evidence presented by the prosecution. Is this not a nightmare? Would you be willing to live in such a land? Or would you be willing to be operated on by a surgeon you tells you that whenever a little voice in him tells him to disregard his medical training, he listens to the little voice? I know it passes in polite company to let people have it both ways, and under most circumstances I wholeheartedly cooperate with this benign agreement. But we're seriously trying to get at the truth here, and if you think that this common but unspoken understanding about faith is anything better than socially useful obfuscation to avoid mutual embarrassment and loss of face, you have either seen much more deeply into the issue that any philosopher ever has (for none has ever come up with a good defense of this) or you are kidding yourself.
    Daniel Dennett
  • A mirror does not develop because an historical pageant passes in front of it. It only develops when it gets a fresh coat of quicksilver
    E. M. Forster
  • Nietzsche … argues that all that passes in the life of a society is ephemeral and banausic except for the presence of great personalities, of men like Goethe … who seem to forge their own destinies, who seem to move unhampered by those burdens of existence which keep most men from rising above the vicissitudes of their daily toil.
    John Carroll
  • When was the last time you looked at anything, solely, and concentratedly, and for its own sake? Ordinary life passes in a near blur. If we go to the theatre or the cinema, the images before us change constantly, and there is the distraction of language. Our loved ones are so well known to us that there is no need to look at them, and one of the gentle jokes of married life is that we do not.
    Jeanette Winterson

Word of the Day

multitasker
The word "multitasker" usually refers to someone who can perform different tasks simultaneously. However, there are several antonyms for this word, which describe the opposite type...