What is another word for was reluctant?

Pronunciation: [wɒz ɹɪlˈʌktənt] (IPA)

When expressing hesitation or unwillingness, there are various phrases you can use instead of "was reluctant." "Hesitated" implies a brief delay before taking action, while "dragged one's feet" suggests a longer period of resistance. "Balked at" and "demurred" emphasize a formal objection or refusal, while "held back" implies a sense of caution or reserve. Other potential synonyms for "was reluctant" include "shied away from," "showed reluctance," "had reservations," and "wasn't keen on." Ultimately, the best synonym will depend on the context and tone of the sentence, as well as the specific nuances of the hesitation being described.

What are the hypernyms for Was reluctant?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for was reluctant?

The phrase "was reluctant" refers to someone who hesitated or was unwilling to do something. The antonyms for "was reluctant" can be words such as eager, enthusiastic, willing, excited or keen. These words have the opposite meaning to "was reluctant", as they imply a sense of positivity and eagerness, rather than hesitation or unwillingness. For instance, if someone is eager to undertake a task, they are enthusiastic and willing to do it, whereas if someone is reluctant, they are hesitant and unwilling. Using antonyms for "was reluctant" can help convey a different mood or tone in writing, depending on the desired effect of the text.

What are the antonyms for Was reluctant?

Famous quotes with Was reluctant

  • But it's a very universal story and the thing is I was reluctant to answer that question because I don't want people latching on to a particular stereotype.
    Parminder Nagra
  • By laying such stress on the moral aspect of social institutions, Marx emphasized our responsibility for the more remote social repercussions of our actions; for instance, of such actions as may help to prolong the life of socially unjust institutions. But although is, in fact, largely a treatise on social ethics, these ethical ideas are never represented as such. They are expressed only by implication, but not the less forcibly on that account, since the implications are very obvious. Marx, I believe, avoided an explicit moral theory, because he hated preaching. Deeply distrustful of the moralist, who usually preaches water and drinks wine, Marx was reluctant to formulate his ethical convictions explicitly. The principles of humanity and decency were for him matters that needed no discussion, matters to be taken for granted. (In this field, too, he was an optimist.) He attacked the moralists because he saw them as the sycophantic apologists of a social order which he felt to be immoral; he attacked the eulogists of liberalism because of their self-satisfaction, because of their identification of freedom with the formal liberty then existing within a social system which destroyed freedom. Thus, by implication, he admitted his love for freedom; and in spite of his bias, as a philosopher, for holism, he was certainly not a collectivist, for he hoped that the state would ‘wither away’. Marx’s faith, I believe, was fundamentally a faith in the open society.
    Karl Marx

Word of the Day

Pyrrolidonecarboxylic Acid
Pyrrolidonecarboxylic acid, commonly known as PCA, is a chemical compound frequently utilized in various industries. However, it is beneficial to be aware of alternative names or s...